Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Ford Mondeo 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2010 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo 2003 engine produces 25 HP less power than Ford Mondeo 2010, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Ford Mondeo 2010. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo 2010 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2010, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo 2003 could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo 2003 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2010. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 710 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo 2010 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ford Mondeo 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford Mondeo 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo 2003 is smaller. Ford Mondeo 2003 is 5 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo 2010, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo 2003 is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 486 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1390 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo 2003 has 14 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 2010. The Ford Mondeo 2010 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo 2010 (by 20 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo 2003 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo 2010. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 2`230 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Ford Mondeo 2010 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo 2003 has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo 2010, so Ford Mondeo 2010 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |