Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Kia Shuma 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Mondeo) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Kia Shuma) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 13.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 1 HP more power than Kia Shuma, whereas torque is 128 NM more than Kia Shuma. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 9.8 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Shuma, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 510 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 660 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 21 cm longer than the Kia Shuma, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1207 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 60 litres more trunk space than the Kia Shuma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 163 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.3 metres more than that of the Kia Shuma, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`980 | 1`645 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Kia Shuma has
| |