Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volvo S60 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo and Volvo S60 have the same engine power, but Ford Mondeo torque is 60 NM less than Volvo S60. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S60 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1470 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1390 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 106 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S60. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volvo S60 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |