Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Skoda Rapid 2012

 
Ford Mondeo
2010 - 2014
Skoda Rapid
2012 - 2017
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP105 HP
Torque: 320 NM250 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds10.6 seconds
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 35 HP more power than Skoda Rapid, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Skoda Rapid. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.64.3
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km5.2 l/100km
The Skoda Rapid is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 195 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Rapid.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1250 km in combined cycle1270 km in combined cycle
1480 km on highway1480 km on highway
1020 km with real consumption1050 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.48 m
Width: 1.89 m1.71 m
Height: 1.50 m1.46 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 30 cm longer than the Skoda Rapid, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 486 litres550 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1390 litres1490 litres
Skoda Rapid has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 64 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Rapid. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Rapid (by 100 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.8 metres more than that of the Skoda Rapid, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2301`725
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Skoda Rapid has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Skoda Rapid, so Skoda Rapid quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 52007000
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • lower price
Skoda Rapid has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv