Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Skoda Superb 2010
| Body: | Hatchback | Estate car / wagon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Skoda Superb is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 25 HP less power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Skoda Superb. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 6.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1520 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 1160 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.51 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 6 cm shorter than the Skoda Superb, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 603 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1390 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 117 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.6 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`180 | 2`132 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 40 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |