Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volvo S60 2010

 
Ford Mondeo
2010 - 2014
Volvo S60
2010 - 2013
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 240 HP203 HP
Torque: 340 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 seconds8.2 seconds
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 37 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.78.7
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Mondeo consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres68 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 900 km in combined cycle780 km in combined cycle
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 4 years1 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.63 m
Width: 1.89 m1.87 m
Height: 1.50 m1.48 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 15 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 486 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1390 litresno data
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 106 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2002`060
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

average
Volvo S60 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volvo S60, so Volvo S60 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 52007400
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo S60 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv