Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Fiat Croma 2008
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 145 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 185 NM | 204 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Ford Mondeo engine produces 2 HP less power than Fiat Croma, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Fiat Croma. Despite less power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.3 | |
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mondeo consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Croma, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
1160 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.89 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.60 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 2 cm longer than the Fiat Croma, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 10 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 500 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1390 litres | no data | |
Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 14 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Croma. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Fiat Croma, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`090 | 2`050 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 5000 | 2400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Fiat Croma has
| |