Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Mazda 6 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo and Mazda 6 have the same engine power, but Ford Mondeo torque is 6 NM less than Mazda 6. Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1020 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mazda 6 2010 1.8 engine: The engine often has an unstable idle speed. The thermostat, cooling pump, and alternator are weak points. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 2 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 486 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1390 litres | 1702 litres | |
|
Mazda 6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 312 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`050 kg | 1`925 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`435 kg | 1`335 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 615 kg | 590 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |