Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Skoda Superb 2015
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.6 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mondeo engine produces 30 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.8 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1490 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 1060 km with real consumption | ||
| Skoda Superb gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.47 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 1 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 625 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1356 litres | no data | |
|
Skoda Superb has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 167 litres less trunk space than the Skoda Superb. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`270 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Skoda Superb scores higher in safety tests. The Skoda Superb scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Skoda Superb has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Skoda Superb, so Skoda Superb quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 400 | 19 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |