Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 203 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 345 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.7 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mondeo engine produces 7 HP less power than Volkswagen Passat CC, but torque is 65 NM more than Volkswagen Passat CC. Due to the lower power, Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Passat CC is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC, which means that by driving the Ford Mondeo over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 63 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 124 mm (4.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.42 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 7 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat CC, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 458 litres | 532 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1356 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`230 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`564 kg | 1`460 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 666 kg | 530 kg | |
| Ford Mondeo load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 20 procentiem more than Volkswagen Passat CC. Therefore, Ford Mondeo is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Ford Mondeo has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Passat CC has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Ford Mondeo, so Ford Mondeo quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8400 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volkswagen Passat CC has
| |