Ford Mondeo 2014 vs Nissan Pulsar 2014

 
Ford Mondeo
2014 - 2018
Nissan Pulsar
2014 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 160 HP115 HP
Torque: 240 NM165 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.1 seconds12.7 seconds
Ford Mondeo is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mondeo engine produces 45 HP more power than Nissan Pulsar, whereas torque is 75 NM more than Nissan Pulsar. Thanks to more power Ford Mondeo reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.35.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.8 l/100km7.2 l/100km
The Nissan Pulsar is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mondeo consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mondeo could require 180 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mondeo consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pulsar.
Fuel tank capacity: 63 litres46 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle900 km in combined cycle
1280 km on highway1040 km on highway
710 km with real consumption630 km with real consumption
Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.87 m4.39 m
Width: 1.85 m1.77 m
Height: 1.48 m1.52 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mondeo is 48 cm longer than the Nissan Pulsar, 8 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 458 litres385 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1356 litresno data
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 73 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pulsar.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters10.2 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Pulsar, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1901`750
Safety:
Quality:
low

average
Nissan Pulsar has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Nissan Pulsar, so Nissan Pulsar quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 92006400
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Nissan Pulsar has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv