Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Volvo S40 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 90 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 143 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 13.4 seconds | 7.3 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.1 | 5.6 - 9.7 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S40. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 8 cm longer than the Volvo S40, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 853 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo has 9 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 437 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Volvo S40, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`826 | ~ 1`756 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo S40 has
| |