Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Opel Vectra 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Opel Vectra
1995 - 1999
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 90 - 205 HP75 - 170 HP
Torque: 138 - 235 NM128 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 - 13.4 seconds8.5 - 15.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.3 - 10.15.9 - 10.7
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Opel Vectra. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Vectra.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.48 m
Width: 1.75 m1.71 m
Height: 1.37 m1.43 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower.
Ford Mondeo is 8 cm longer than the Opel Vectra, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1290 litres790 litres
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres less than that of the Opel Vectra.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`826~ 1`817
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 6.2/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Opel Vectra has
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv