Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.3 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 82 - 140 HP | |
Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 120 - 265 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 13.4 seconds | 9.2 - 15 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.1 | 5.4 - 8.4 | |
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.56 m | 4.46 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.40 m | |
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 480 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 460 litres | |
Ford Mondeo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 830 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`826 | ~ 1`673 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mitsubishi Carisma has
| |