Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mitsubishi Carisma 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Mitsubishi Carisma
1995 - 2003
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.3 - 1.9

Performance

Power: 90 - 205 HP82 - 140 HP
Torque: 138 - 235 NM120 - 265 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 - 13.4 seconds9.2 - 15 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.3 - 10.15.4 - 8.4
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mitsubishi Carisma. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Carisma.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.56 m4.46 m
Width: 1.75 m1.71 m
Height: 1.37 m1.40 m
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mondeo is 10 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Carisma, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 480 litres460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1290 litres460 litres
Ford Mondeo has 20 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Carisma. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 830 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Carisma.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`826~ 1`673
Safety:
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 600800
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • lower price
Mitsubishi Carisma has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv