Ford Mondeo 2000 vs Chrysler Neon 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 - 2.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 226 HP | 115 - 133 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 330 NM | 157 - 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.4 - 12.8 seconds | 9 - 12.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 - 10.7 | 7.3 - 8.8 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Neon. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 370 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 130 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`939 | ~ 1`613 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |