Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volvo V40 2012

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
2010 - 2013
Volvo V40
2012 - 2016
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.21.6 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 115 - 240 HP115 - 254 HP
Torque: 159 - 420 NM220 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 12.3 seconds6.3 - 12.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 7.93.2 - 9.0
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.84 m4.37 m
Width: 1.89 m1.83 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Ford Mondeo is larger.
Ford Mondeo is 48 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 554 litres335 litres
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 219 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40.
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11.2 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo V40.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`165~ 1`976
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

above average
Average price (€): 46009000
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo V40 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv