Ford Mondeo 2010 vs Volkswagen Passat 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.2 | 1.4 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 240 HP | 105 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 159 - 420 NM | 200 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.5 - 12.3 seconds | 5.5 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 - 7.9 | 4.3 - 7.7 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.84 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Passat, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 554 litres | 565 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 11 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`165 | ~ 2`078 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4600 | 4800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Passat has
| |