Ford Mondeo 2013 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 240 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 450 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 12.1 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.6 - 9.4 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 128 mm (5 inches) | 230 mm (9.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo XC60 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.87 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 24 cm longer than the Volvo XC60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 429 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mondeo has 66 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. This could mean that the Ford Mondeo uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`224 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |