Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Mazda 626 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 90 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 145 - 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 13.9 seconds | 10.5 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 - 10.3 | 5.5 - 9.1 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.52 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but lower. Ford Mondeo is 1 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1610 litres | 1677 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda 626, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`953 | ~ 1`844 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |