Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Honda Accord 1999

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Honda Accord
1999 - 2001
Body: Estate car / wagonHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.6 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 90 - 205 HP105 - 154 HP
Torque: 138 - 235 NM140 - 210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 13.9 seconds9.8 - 13.5 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 10.36.4 - 9.2
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.60 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.39 m1.43 m
Ford Mondeo is 7 cm longer than the Honda Accord, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres450 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1610 litresno data
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity.
Ford Mondeo has 90 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord.
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`953~ 1`914
Safety:
Quality:
below average

above average
Average price (€): 22001400
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Honda Accord has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv