Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.6 - 2.51.8 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 90 - 205 HP90 - 226 HP
Torque: 138 - 235 NM165 - 360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8 - 13.9 seconds7.7 - 13.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.7 - 10.36.0 - 10.7
On average, the Ford Mondeo 1996 petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Ford Mondeo 2003. On average, Ford Mondeo 1996 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo 2003.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.80 m
Width: 1.75 m1.81 m
Height: 1.39 m1.44 m
Ford Mondeo 1996 is smaller.
Ford Mondeo 1996 is 13 cm shorter than the Ford Mondeo 2003, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo 1996 is 5 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 540 litres540 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
1610 litres1700 litres
Turning diameter: 10.3 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo 1996 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Ford Mondeo 2003, which means Ford Mondeo 1996 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: ~ 1`953 kg~ 2`115 kg
Net weight:~ 1`367 kg~ 1`488 kg
Load capacity:~ 586 kg~ 627 kg
Safety: no data
Quality:
below average

average
Average price (€): 20001000
Rating in user reviews: 8.3/10 7.5/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Ford Mondeo has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv