Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Volvo V40 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 3.0 | 1.6 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 226 HP | 102 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 360 NM | 145 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 13.4 seconds | 7.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 10.7 | 5.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger. Ford Mondeo is 32 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 540 litres | 471 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1700 litres | 1421 litres | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage capacity. Ford Mondeo has 69 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V40. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Mondeo (by 279 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres more than that of the Volvo V40, which means Ford Mondeo can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`115 | ~ 1`789 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.5/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |