Ford Mondeo 1996 vs SAAB 9000 1991
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 130 - 224 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 177 - 342 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13.5 seconds | 6.9 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.1 | 9.1 - 11.7 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.42 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is smaller. Ford Mondeo is 20 cm shorter than the SAAB 9000, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 488 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | no data | |
|
SAAB 9000 has more luggage space. Ford Mondeo has 28 litres less trunk space than the SAAB 9000. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.6 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`829 | ~ 1`816 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |