Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Honda Accord 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 105 - 154 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 140 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13.5 seconds | 9.8 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.1 | 6.4 - 9.2 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
| Ford Mondeo is 4 cm shorter than the Honda Accord, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Mondeo is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | no data | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mondeo has 10 litres more trunk space than the Honda Accord. The Honda Accord may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 1.1 metres less than that of the Honda Accord, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`829 | ~ 1`914 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Honda Accord has
| |