Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 90 - 205 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 138 - 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13.5 seconds | 7.7 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.1 | 6.3 - 10.1 | |
|
Ford Mondeo 1996 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mondeo 1996. On average, a Ford Mondeo 1996 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Mondeo 1996. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo 1996 and Ford Mondeo 1996 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Ford Mondeo 1996 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo 1996. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`829 | ~ 1`826 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |