Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Toyota Carina E 1992
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 73 - 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 132 - 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13.5 seconds | 8.4 - 16.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.1 | 5.8 - 8.5 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Carina E. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Carina E. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mondeo is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mondeo is 3 cm longer than the Toyota Carina E, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 470 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1290 litres | 1250 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Carina E, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`829 kg | ~ 1`684 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`318 kg | ~ 1`181 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 511 kg | ~ 503 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Toyota Carina E has
| |