Ford Mondeo 1996 vs Citroen Xantia 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.6 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.9 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 205 HP | 75 - 194 HP | |
| Torque: | 138 - 235 NM | 135 - 267 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 13.5 seconds | 8.2 - 17.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 - 10.1 | 5.5 - 11.6 | |
|
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Citroen Xantia. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen Xantia. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.38 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 4 cm longer than the Citroen Xantia, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1290 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.7 metres less than that of the Citroen Xantia, which means Ford Mondeo can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`829 | ~ 1`461 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mondeo has
|
Citroen Xantia has
| |