Ford Mondeo 2003 vs Mazda 6 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Mondeo
2003 - 2005
Mazda 6
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 3.01.8 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 90 - 226 HP120 - 166 HP
Torque: 165 - 360 NM165 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.5 - 12.9 seconds9 - 11.8 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.7 - 10.76.5 - 9.1
Ford Mondeo petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, Ford Mondeo equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.73 m4.67 m
Width: 1.81 m1.78 m
Height: 1.43 m1.44 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Mondeo is 6 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mondeo is 1 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 500 litres492 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litresno data
Ford Mondeo has 8 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Mondeo is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 6.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`934~ 1`896
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 10001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.5/10 6.3/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Mondeo has
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv