Ford Galaxy 1997 vs Fiat Ulysse 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 9 HP more power than Fiat Ulysse, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Fiat Ulysse. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 9.7 | |
|
The Fiat Ulysse is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Ulysse, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Fiat Ulysse gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.45 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 17 cm longer than the Fiat Ulysse, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.7 metres less than that of the Fiat Ulysse, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Fiat Ulysse has
| |