Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 225 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 35 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 55 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 240 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |