Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 162 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 5 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 8 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 180 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 35 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 676 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1498 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |