Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 41 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager, whereas torque is 105 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 13.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.8 l/100km | 12.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 5.07 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller. Ford Galaxy is 45 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 671 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4880 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.9 metres less than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |