Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Seat Alhambra 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 35 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.1 | |
| Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.6 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |