Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Renault Espace 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 168 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy and Renault Espace have the same engine power, but Ford Galaxy torque is 2 NM more than Renault Espace. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 10.7 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.77 m | |
| Ford Galaxy is 10 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2850 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Espace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Renault Espace has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Renault Espace quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |