Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 88 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 130 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 5.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.0 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 15 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 6800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |