Ford Galaxy 1998 vs Ford S-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 235 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.1 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 30 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 8.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.0 | |
|
The Ford S-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| Ford S-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford S-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but higher. Ford Galaxy is 15 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 266 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 266 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2610 litres | 2000 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Ford S-Max has more luggage space (by 19 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 610 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`400 kg | 2`505 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`640 kg | 1`689 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 760 kg | 816 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 7 procentiem less than Ford S-Max. Therefore, Ford S-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 590 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 6400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |