Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Ford Galaxy) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mitsubishi Space Runner) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 46 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, but torque is 24 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 9.2 | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 33 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1800 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means Ford Galaxy can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`880 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
| |