Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 202 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy and Toyota Picnic have the same engine power, but Ford Galaxy torque is 3 NM less than Toyota Picnic. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 1110 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 10 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 800 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |