Ford Galaxy 1995 vs Dodge Grand Caravan 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.4 Petrol | |
Diesel (Ford Galaxy) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Dodge Grand Caravan) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 202 NM | 226 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.1 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Ford Galaxy engine produces 60 HP less power than Dodge Grand Caravan, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Dodge Grand Caravan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dodge Grand Caravan 1996 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Dodge Grand Caravan 1996 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.62 m | 5.07 m | |
Width: | 1.80 m | 1.95 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
Ford Galaxy is smaller. Ford Galaxy is 45 cm shorter than the Dodge Grand Caravan, 15 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 575 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`610 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Grand Caravan has
| |