Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 215 HP | |
| Torque: | 268 NM | 299 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |