Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Toyota Sienna 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 268 NM | 284 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Toyota Sienna is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 7 HP more power than Toyota Sienna, but torque is 16 NM less than Toyota Sienna. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.6 | 9.6 | |
| Ford Galaxy consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Sienna, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 79 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Galaxy is 27 cm shorter than the Toyota Sienna, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 755 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | no data | |