Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 160 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 36 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 43 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger, but lower. Ford Galaxy is 24 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caddy, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2239 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Caddy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 215 percent more cases than Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Caddy quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |