Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 145 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 203 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.3 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 17 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 6 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2600 litres | 1840 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 760 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`420 kg | 2`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`610 kg | 1`335 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 810 kg | 675 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Toyota Picnic. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |