Ford Galaxy 2001 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.4 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 20 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Galaxy could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1930 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Space Wagon has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 70 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, so Mitsubishi Space Wagon quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |