Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Ford Galaxy 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 17.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy 2003 is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy 2003 engine produces 40 HP more power than Ford Galaxy 2003, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Ford Galaxy 2003. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy 2003 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.0 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy 2003 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Galaxy 2003 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2003, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy 2003 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Galaxy 2003 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy 2003. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.73 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy 2003 and Ford Galaxy 2003 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
| |