Ford Galaxy 2003 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive. Ford Galaxy engine produces 40 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 6 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 180 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 330 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2600 litres | 1840 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford Galaxy (by 760 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`430 kg | 2`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`670 kg | 1`420 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 760 kg | 590 kg | |
| Ford Galaxy load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem more than Toyota Picnic. Therefore, Ford Galaxy is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |