Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 15.1 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Ford Galaxy engine produces 25 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Despite the higher power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.7 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 930 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`010 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |