Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

 
Ford Galaxy
2000 - 2003
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 90 HP90 HP
Torque: 240 NM202 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 17.2 seconds19.3 seconds
Ford Galaxy is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Galaxy and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, but Ford Galaxy torque is 38 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.6
Real fuel consumption: 6.3 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle1130 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1380 km on highway
1110 km with real consumption1080 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.62 m
Width: 1.81 m1.81 m
Height: 1.73 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Galaxy is 2 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: 11.1 meters11.7 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`000
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

low
Volkswagen Sharan has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Ford Galaxy, so Volkswagen Sharan quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 14001000
Rating in user reviews: 7.7/10 7.4/10
Pros and Cons: Ford Galaxy has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv