Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Chrysler Voyager 1999
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
Torque: | 240 NM | 262 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
Chrysler Voyager is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 24 HP less power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 22 NM less than Chrysler Voyager. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 9.2 | |
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Galaxy consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 75 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.92 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.74 m | |
Ford Galaxy is smaller. Ford Galaxy is 9 cm shorter than the Chrysler Voyager, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.4 metres less than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Ford Galaxy can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | low | low | |
Ford Galaxy has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Chrysler Voyager has serious deffects in 125 percent more cases than Ford Galaxy, so Ford Galaxy quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 1200 | 800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |