Ford Galaxy 2000 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 17.2 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Toyota Picnic is a more dynamic driving. Ford Galaxy engine produces 38 HP less power than Toyota Picnic, but torque is 62 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Due to the lower power, Ford Galaxy reaches 100 km/h speed 6.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 9.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Galaxy consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that by driving the Ford Galaxy over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Galaxy consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 1110 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Ford Galaxy is larger. Ford Galaxy is 11 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Galaxy is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Galaxy is 0.1 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Toyota Picnic has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 300 percent more cases than Toyota Picnic, so Toyota Picnic quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Galaxy has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |